The Twitter-verse can be a wonderful place.
Aside from the fact that users have direct access to their favorite people and brands, the platforms never-ending supply of accounts dedicated to random subjects are among the many benefits Twitter has to offer.
The dog-loving account called We Rate Dogs is proof.
However, the overwhelming joy delivered by this particular account didnt come from dog selfies this time around.
Lets just say the person behind this account had a few choice words for a trolling hater after some guy named Brant tweeted, Your rating system sucks. Just change your name to CuteDogs.’
Burn.
Luckily, Brant didnt get away with offering his unwanted opinion.
Heres the hateful tweet.
@dog_rates your rating system sucks. Just change your name to CuteDogs.
Brant (@brant) September 12, 2016
We Rate Dogs then fired back with a witty tweet of their own.
@brant Why are you so mad Bront
WeRateDogs (@dog_rates) September 12, 2016
Brant fired back with a quip of his own.
@dog_rates well you give every dog 11s and 12s. It doesn’t even make any sense.
Brant (@brant) September 12, 2016
Its official purposely misspelling the names of your sworn enemies is the best way to get your revenge.
@brant they’re good dogs Brent
WeRateDogs (@dog_rates) September 12, 2016
First, they went with Bront and now Brent. Poor Brant.
@dog_rates it’s a cheap gimmick
Brant (@brant) September 12, 2016
Behold, the birth of Brint. This Twitter account isnt playing games.
@brant well, Brint, the people love it and I’m doing it for them, not you
WeRateDogs (@dog_rates) September 12, 2016
Still, Brant felt the need to stress his point.
@OrneryPiglett @dog_rates all I’m saying is you could have real legitimate ratings, instead of just saying every dog is a 10, 11, or 12
Brant (@brant) September 12, 2016
We Rate Dogs doesnt care what you think, bro.
@brant @OrneryPiglett that’s how it started, but as the audience grew, the amount of submissions grew. Standards were raised
WeRateDogs (@dog_rates) September 12, 2016
Brant decided to point out that they should probably cater to not-so-good-looking dogs as well. Valid point.
@dog_rates @OrneryPiglett you could also show some of the less cute dogs as well like some 3s or 4s
Brant (@brant) September 12, 2016
In case you were wondering, this dog is an 11/10.
This is Anakin. He strives to reach his full doggo potential. Born with blurry tail tho. 11/10 would still pet well pic.twitter.com/9CcBSxCXXG
WeRateDogs (@dog_rates) September 13, 2016
Brant just wants to see what a five or six would look like, though.
@J_Dub23_1 @dog_rates God forbid we ever see what a 5 or 6 looks like
Brant (@brant) September 12, 2016
Since the mastermind behind the We Rate Dogs Twitter account clearly has better things to do, they had the last word.
@brant @J_Dub23_1 well you should do your research and you could easily find out Brunt
WeRateDogs (@dog_rates) September 12, 2016
The lesson learned here is actually quite simple dont mess with anonymous Twitter accounts dedicated to rating cute dogs.
You might just getyour name changed six different times in front of 400,000 people.
Oh, and Brant, youre going to need to find a new way to get dog ratings, buddy.
Subscribe to Elite Dailys official newsletter, The Edge, for more stories you dont want to miss.
Read more: http://elitedaily.com/social-news/twitter-account-rates-cute-dogs-calls-out-hater/1610091/
The post Twitter Account That Rates Cute Dogs Calls Out A Hater In The Most Epic Rant appeared first on DogVirals.com - Funny Dog Pics & Videos.
source http://www.dogvirals.com/twitter-account-that-rates-cute-dogs-calls-out-a-hater-in-the-most-epic-rant/
No comments:
Post a Comment